NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 902 MHz
- 1383.4x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2880
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 8096
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 551
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 24013
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 67.178
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 1816.61
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 7.435
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 88.889
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 355.166
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 12657
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 12657
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 23 July 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2880 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 vs 8096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 vs 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 vs 24013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3711 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 8096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 24013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Code name | GA104 | GK110B |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 108 | 364 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
Price now | $833.98 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 902 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 7,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |