NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 73% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 902 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 216.5 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 2880
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 61% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 12 GB
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 versus 8096
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 versus 551
- 5.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 versus 24013
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 67.178
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 versus 1816.61
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 7.435
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 88.889
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 355.166
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 12657
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 12657
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 902 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 216.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 2880 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 12 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 versus 8096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 versus 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 versus 24013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 versus 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3711 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 735 MHz
- 3.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 8096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 24013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Nom de code | GA104 | GK110B |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 108 | 364 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
Prix maintenant | $833.98 | |
Genre | Workstation | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 902 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 797 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 7,080 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,196 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |