NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 122777 vs 85890
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 282.628
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 3403.106
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 24.719
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 136.919
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 1010.818
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 20206
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 20206
- Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11086 vs 7856
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 122777 vs 85890 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 282.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 3403.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 24.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 136.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 1010.818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11086 vs 7856 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 735 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19403 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1000 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 122777 | 85890 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 282.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 3403.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 24.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 136.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1010.818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11086 | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 13 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 106 | 206 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A4000 with others
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAA30
