NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 2304
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 122777 versus 85890
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 282.628
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 versus 3403.106
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 24.719
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 136.919
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 1010.818
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 20206
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 20206
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11086 versus 7856
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 13 November 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6144 versus 2304 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 122777 versus 85890 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 282.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 versus 3403.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 24.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 136.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 1010.818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11086 versus 7856 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 735 MHz
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19403 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1000 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 122777 | 85890 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 282.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 3403.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 24.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 136.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1010.818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11086 | 7856 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 13 November 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 106 | 206 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A4000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAA30
