NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1531 MHz
• 873.4x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
• Around 71% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 3584
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 67348
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 165.792
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 2368.267
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 17.829
• 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 21.354
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 992.132
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 10841
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3696
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3333
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 10841
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3696
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3333
• Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2604 vs 2243

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

• Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 735 MHz
• 5.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	121768 67348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	420.465 165.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4156.52 2368.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.297 17.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.131 21.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1895.111 992.132
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22050 10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22050 10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2604 2243

Compare specifications (specs)