NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1170 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1095 MHz
• 2.8x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2944
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22901 vs 13147
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1038 vs 536
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154651 vs 81953
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 297.996
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 3676.805
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 22.75
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 162.692
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1116.69
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 19139
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 19139

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3714
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3355
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3714
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22901 13147
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1038 536
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	154651 81953
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	581.432 297.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6836.931 3676.805
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.372 22.75
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	191.518 162.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2038.811 1116.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22508 19139
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 8905
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 8060
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22508 19139
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 8905
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 8060

Compare specifications (specs)