NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A5000 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 59% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1170 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 55% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1695 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- 2.8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 8192 vs 2944
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22553 vs 12935
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 vs 519
- Etwa 83% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154729 vs 84332
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 297.996
- Etwa 86% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 3676.805
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 22.75
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 162.692
- Etwa 83% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1116.69
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 19139
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 19139
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1170 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 8192 vs 2944 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 vs 12935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 vs 519 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 vs 84332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 297.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 vs 3676.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 vs 162.692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 vs 1116.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 vs 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 vs 19139 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Etwa 53% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 6x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3714
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3355
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3714
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3355
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 3355 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 | 12935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 | 519 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 | 84332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 297.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 3676.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 162.692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1116.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8060 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8060 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Ampere | Turing |
| Codename | GA102 | TU104B |
| Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 69 | 135 |
| Typ | Laptop | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1170 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
| Leitungssysteme | 8192 | 2944 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texturfüllrate | 433.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 230 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 13,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | |
| Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 24 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 768 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
