NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 5528.565
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 vs 5528.565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 433.9 GTexel/s
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 8192
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26712 vs 22750
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 vs 1031
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191364 vs 154778
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 711.408 vs 581.432
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.812 vs 54.372
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 228.496 vs 191.518
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2431.277 vs 2038.811
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 22508
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 22508
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 433.9 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 8192 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26712 vs 22750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 vs 1031 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191364 vs 154778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 711.408 vs 581.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.812 vs 54.372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 228.496 vs 191.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2431.277 vs 2038.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 22508 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22750 | 26712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1031 | 1052 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154778 | 191364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 711.408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 5528.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 62.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 228.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 2431.277 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19889 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA102 | GA102 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 71 | 48 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1170 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 8192 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Triple-slot |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |