NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 64% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 versus 5528.565
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 versus 5528.565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3354 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1170 MHz
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 433.9 GTexel/s
- Environ 28% de pipelines plus haut: 10496 versus 8192
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26712 versus 22750
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 versus 1031
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191364 versus 154778
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 711.408 versus 581.432
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.812 versus 54.372
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 228.496 versus 191.518
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2431.277 versus 2038.811
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 22508
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 22508
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1170 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 433.9 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 versus 8192 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26712 versus 22750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 versus 1031 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191364 versus 154778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 711.408 versus 581.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.812 versus 54.372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 228.496 versus 191.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2431.277 versus 2038.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 22508 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22750 | 26712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1031 | 1052 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154778 | 191364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 711.408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 5528.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 62.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 228.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 2431.277 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19889 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA102 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 71 | 48 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 8192 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 750 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Triple-slot |
Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 384 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |