NVIDIA T600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA T600

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 53.40 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27855 vs 14219
3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.685 vs 25.896
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1176.034 vs 486.804
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.06 vs 2.503
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.328 vs 53.111
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 263.201 vs 100.658

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 Apr 2021 vs 27 May 2019
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Texture fill rate	53.40 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	27855 vs 14219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	93.685 vs 25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1176.034 vs 486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.06 vs 2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	55.328 vs 53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	263.201 vs 100.658

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 735 MHz
3.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)

Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 735 MHz
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

27855

14219

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

93.685

25.896

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1176.034

486.804

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.06

2.503

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

55.328

53.111

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

263.201

100.658

Name	NVIDIA T600	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Geekbench - OpenCL	27855	14219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	93.685	25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1176.034	486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.06	2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	55.328	53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	263.201	100.658
PassMark - G3D Mark		2398
PassMark - G2D Mark		411
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3352

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA T600	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Polaris
Code name	TU117	Lexa
Launch date	12 Apr 2021	27 May 2019
Place in performance rating	756	841
Launch price (MSRP)		$199
Type		Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz	1082 MHz
Core clock speed	735 MHz	925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	53.40 GFLOPS (1:32)	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	3.418 TFLOPS (2:1)	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1.709 TFLOPS	1,385 GFLOPS
Pipelines	640
Pixel fill rate	42.72 GPixel/s	17.31 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	53.40 GTexel/s	34.62 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	2200 million
Compute units		10
Stream Processors		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Single-slot
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Recommended system power (PSU)	200 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Height		Half Height
Length		6.6" (168 mm)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	96 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)