NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1132 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1628 MHz
- 8.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20362 vs 19824
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 19663
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 19663
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1132 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1628 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 vs 19824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 19663 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4608
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 848 vs 840
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 143963 vs 138072
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 4608 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 848 vs 840 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 143963 vs 138072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 | 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 | 848 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 143963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU102 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 18 December 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | $8,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 109 | 93 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 463.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 870.4 GB / s | |
