NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1312 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20362 vs 16235
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 840 vs 406
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 16337
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 16337
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 21 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1312 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 vs 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 vs 406 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 16337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4608
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 176660 vs 138072
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 4608 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 280 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 176660 vs 138072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 | 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 176660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.167 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU102 | GV100 |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 109 | 130 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1312 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s |