NVIDIA TITAN RTX versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1312 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20362 versus 16235
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 840 versus 406
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 versus 16337
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 versus 16337
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 December 2018 versus 21 June 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1312 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 versus 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 versus 406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 versus 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 versus 16337 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 4608
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 280 Watt
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 176660 versus 138072
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 4608 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 280 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 176660 versus 138072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 | 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 | 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 176660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.167 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU102 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 18 December 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 109 | 130 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1312 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 897.0 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA TITAN RTX avec des autres
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
