NVIDIA TITAN V vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN V and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 465.6 GTexel / s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1792
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 14,899 gflops vs 4,398 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 9083
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 700
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 102892
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 December 2017 vs 11 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 465.6 GTexel / s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops vs 4,398 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19884 vs 9083 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 700 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 vs 102892 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1700 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN V
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN V | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19884 | 9083 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 | 700 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150662 | 102892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13111 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN V | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | Pascal |
Code name | GV100 | GP104 |
Launch date | 7 December 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 149 | 107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | 4,398 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 465.6 GTexel / s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 652.8 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 3072 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |