NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Tesla K10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date 22 July 2014 vs 1 May 2012
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 41 Watt vs 225 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10

  • 16.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
  • 5.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 vs 6869
  • Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 vs 22.112
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 vs 297.631
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 vs 1.427
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3632 vs 2490
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3329
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3632 vs 2490
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3329
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 1536 vs 384
Floating-point performance 2x 2,289 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
Maximum memory size 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 14029 vs 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.736 vs 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 975.508 vs 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.39 vs 1.427
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3632 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3632 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K10

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6869
14029
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.112
40.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
297.631
975.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.427
3.39
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2490
3632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2490
3632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
3353
Name NVIDIA Quadro K620 NVIDIA Tesla K10
PassMark - G3D Mark 2233
PassMark - G2D Mark 472
Geekbench - OpenCL 6869 14029
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.112 40.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 297.631 975.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.427 3.39
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2490 3632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2490 3632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 702

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K620 NVIDIA Tesla K10

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK104
Launch date 22 July 2014 1 May 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $189.89 $5,099
Place in performance rating 974 977
Price now $189.93
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 15.23

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1058 MHz 745 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 2x 2,289 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 2x 1536
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 41 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 160 mm 272 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2x 4 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 2x 160.0 GB / s

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management