NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs AMD FirePro M5950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20c and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 8.4x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- 5.2x more pipelines: 2496 vs 480
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 13.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 vs 1135
- 32.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 vs 1.199
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 323.699
- 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 vs 0.535
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 16.137
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 vs 66.638
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 vs 4 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 vs 1135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 vs 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 vs 323.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 vs 0.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 vs 16.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 vs 66.638 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 706 MHz
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 225 Watt
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | AMD FirePro M5950 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 | 1135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 | 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 | 323.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 | 0.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 | 16.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 | 66.638 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1314 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1528 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1528 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c | AMD FirePro M5950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK110 | Whistler |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 | 4 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Place in performance rating | 1006 | 1007 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2496 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | 57 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |