NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20m and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla K20m

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 18% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 600 MHz
30.6x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
31.2x more pipelines: 2496 vs 80
36.7x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 96 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
10x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 512 MB
4.3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1200 MHz
86.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4432 vs 51

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 January 2013 vs 1 January 2009
Core clock speed	706 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	146.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2496 vs 80
Floating-point performance	3,524 gflops vs 96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4432 vs 51

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

7x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 225 Watt
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 210

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	32 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	482 vs 210

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4432

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

210

482

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K20m	ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
PassMark - G3D Mark	4432	51
PassMark - G2D Mark	210	482
Geekbench - OpenCL	14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10873

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K20m	ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale
Code name	GK110	RV620
Launch date	5 January 2013	1 January 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,199
Place in performance rating	408	322
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	706 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,524 gflops	96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	2496	80
Texture fill rate	146.8 GTexel / s	4.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	32 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	181 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x VHDCI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	170 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	208.0 GB / s	38.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	320 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3