NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs ATI FireGL V8650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20m and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 688 MHz
• 13.3x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
• 7.8x more pipelines: 2496 vs 320
• 8x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
• 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
• 3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1736 MHz
• 8.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4432 vs 550
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3357
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650

• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 210

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4432 550
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	210 637
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10873 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10873 3357

Compare specifications (specs)