NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20m and ATI Radeon X1650 GTO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 587 MHz
- 62.5x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 20x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.6x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 784 MHz
- 59.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4432 vs 75
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2013 vs 2 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 587 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 784 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4432 vs 75 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 210
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 vs 210 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | ATI Radeon X1650 GTO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4432 | 75 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 384 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14510 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8319 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K20m | ATI Radeon X1650 GTO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | R500 |
Code name | GK110 | RV530 |
Launch date | 5 January 2013 | 2 December 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Place in performance rating | 418 | 417 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 587 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 2496 | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | 2.348 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | 12.54 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 784 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |