NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40m and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1344
- Around 63% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19519 vs 14380
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 41.336
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 1351.496
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 4.121
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 58.14
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 156.419
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 vs 27 September 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19519 vs 14380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 vs 41.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 vs 1351.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 vs 4.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 vs 58.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 vs 156.419 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 245 Watt
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 575 vs 184
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5328 vs 3143
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 575 vs 184 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5328 vs 3143 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19519 | 14380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 | 41.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 | 1351.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 | 4.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 | 58.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 | 156.419 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | 575 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3143 | 5328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK110B | GK104 |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 | 27 September 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 574 | 575 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 745 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |