NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 90.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- 7.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 640
- 9.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Launch date | 17 November 2014 vs 28 April 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops vs 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 12 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 300 Watt
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18310 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 910 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 114 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80m | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GK210 | RV740 |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 | 28 April 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 754 | 753 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 203 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 12 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 240.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |