NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
67.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 32.2 GTexel / s
11.1x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 448
8.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 6 GB
Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18310 vs 9716
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 26.223
Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 vs 908.754
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 43.519
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 vs 93.344
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 3.015

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2014 vs 25 July 2011
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 448
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18310 vs 9716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	62.651 vs 26.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1653.567 vs 908.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	86.984 vs 43.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	258.278 vs 93.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.882 vs 3.015

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Around 2% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 238 Watt vs 300 Watt

Core clock speed	575 MHz vs 562 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	238 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

18310

9716

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

62.651

26.223

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1653.567

908.754

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

86.984

43.519

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

258.278

93.344

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.882

3.015

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Geekbench - OpenCL	18310	9716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	62.651	26.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1653.567	908.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	86.984	43.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	258.278	93.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.882	3.015
PassMark - G3D Mark		3121
PassMark - G2D Mark		462
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3351

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GK210	GF100
Launch date	17 November 2014	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	754	757
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	876 MHz
Core clock speed	562 MHz	575 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	2x 2496	448
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec	32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	238 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 12 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	2x 240.6 GB / s	144.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5