NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q and ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s
- Around 87% higher pipelines: 448 vs 240
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 288.48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 24x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 96% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 344
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 292
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 6 November 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 240 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops vs 288.48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 344 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 vs 292 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 574 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
Core clock speed | 601 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 344 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | 292 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2648 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2648 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF100 | R600 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 6 November 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Place in performance rating | 777 | 780 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 601 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | 288.48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | 7.21 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |