NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 34% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 574 MHz
3.1x more texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3132 MHz
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3191 vs 1306

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	771 MHz vs 574 MHz
Texture fill rate	98.69 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1536 vs 448
Floating-point performance	2,369 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz vs 3132 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3191 vs 1306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 350
4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.784 vs 5.972
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 355.305
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.125 vs 1.022
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 15.706
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.533 vs 34.772

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 350
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.784 vs 5.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	917.512 vs 355.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.125 vs 1.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.227 vs 15.706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.533 vs 34.772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3191

1306

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

350

444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.972

24.784

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

355.305

917.512

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.022

3.125

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.706

44.227

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.772

93.533

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K5100M	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	3191	1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	350	444
Geekbench - OpenCL	11427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.972	24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	355.305	917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.022	3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.706	44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	34.772	93.533
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K5100M	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF100
Launch date	23 July 2013	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	775	777
Price now	$309.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	13.80
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,489
Technical info
Core clock speed	771 MHz	574 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,369 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1536	448
Texture fill rate	98.69 GTexel / s	32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		248 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB / s	150.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus