NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 66% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 574 MHz
  • 4x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
  • 3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
  • 3x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 1306
  • Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 vs 24.784
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.125
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 March 2014 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 574 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.1 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 448
Floating-point performance 3,050 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3818 vs 1306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.273 vs 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.914 vs 3.125

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 333
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 777.677
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 38.196
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.533 vs 82.511
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 444 vs 333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 917.512 vs 777.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.227 vs 38.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.533 vs 82.511

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3818
1306
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
333
444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
46.273
24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
777.677
917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.914
3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
38.196
44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
82.511
93.533
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 3818 1306
PassMark - G2D Mark 333 444
Geekbench - OpenCL 15023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.273 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 777.677 917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.914 3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.196 44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 82.511 93.533
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1611

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK104 GF100
Launch date 12 March 2014 25 July 2011
Place in performance rating 774 777
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $5,489

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz
Core clock speed 954 MHz 574 MHz
CUDA cores 1536
Floating-point performance 3,050 gflops 1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1536 448
Texture fill rate 127.1 GTexel / s 32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 122 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 248 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 150.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5
Memory clock speed 3132 MHz

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA