NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 66% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 574 MHz
4x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
3x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 1306
Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.42 vs 24.784
Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.915 vs 3.125

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 March 2014 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 574 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.1 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1536 vs 448
Floating-point performance	3,050 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	122 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3818 vs 1306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	34.42 vs 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.915 vs 3.125

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 333
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 776.776
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 36.688
Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.533 vs 82.511

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	917.512 vs 776.776
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.227 vs 36.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.533 vs 82.511

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3818

1306

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

333

444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.42

24.784

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

776.776

917.512

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.915

3.125

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

36.688

44.227

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

82.511

93.533

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	3818	1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	333	444
Geekbench - OpenCL	15023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	34.42	24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	776.776	917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.915	3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	36.688	44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	82.511	93.533
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1611

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF100
Launch date	12 March 2014	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	786	788
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,489
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	954 MHz	574 MHz
CUDA cores	1536
Floating-point performance	3,050 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1536	448
Texture fill rate	127.1 GTexel / s	32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	122 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		248 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	150.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		3132 MHz
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA