NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 2x more texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
  • 4.7x more pipelines: 448 vs 96
  • 6.4x better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 160 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 96% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 365
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 467
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 July 2011 vs 23 February 2008
Core clock speed 574 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate 32.1 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
Pipelines 448 vs 96
Floating-point performance 1,027.7 gflops vs 160 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 3132 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 444 vs 365
PassMark - G3D Mark 1306 vs 467

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

  • 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 70 Watt vs 225 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
444
365
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1306
467
Name NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.533
PassMark - G2D Mark 444 365
PassMark - G3D Mark 1306 467
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1820
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1820

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Tesla
Code name GF100 G92
Launch date 25 July 2011 23 February 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $5,489
Place in performance rating 777 779
Type Workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 574 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,027.7 gflops 160 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 448 96
Texture fill rate 32.1 GTexel / s 16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 70 Watt
Transistor count 3,100 million 754 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-HE
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 150.3 GB / s 51.1 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 3132 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Gigathread technology
HDCP-capable
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0