NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD FirePro V5900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro V5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 85% higher memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 2880
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 8.167
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 409.102
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 0.772
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 20.064
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 66.259
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 24 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 614.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 vs 2880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 vs 8.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 vs 409.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 vs 0.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 vs 20.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 vs 66.259 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V5900
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | AMD FirePro V5900 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 | 2880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 | 8.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | 409.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | 0.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | 20.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 | 66.259 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1238 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2091 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2091 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | AMD FirePro V5900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GF110 | Cayman |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 24 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1090 | 1091 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops | 614.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 230 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 177.6 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |