NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 4926
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 14.758
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 302.509
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 0.965
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 14.925
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 27.656
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 13 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 601.3 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 vs 4926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 vs 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 vs 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 vs 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 vs 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 vs 27.656 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 106 Watt vs 250 Watt
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 | 4926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 | 27.656 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF110 | GF106 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 13 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1143 | 1144 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Price now | $64.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 177.6 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |