NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs AMD FirePro R5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M60 and AMD FirePro R5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 54.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 768
- 7.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7927 vs 2647
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 25 February 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7927 vs 2647 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro R5000
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 557 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 625 vs 549
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 886
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1791
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 886
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1791
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 625 vs 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 1791 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: AMD FirePro R5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | AMD FirePro R5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7927 | 2647 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 625 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26889 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 886 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 886 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M60 | AMD FirePro R5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 25 February 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 466 | 402 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,099 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 39.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.4 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |