NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M60 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 24x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1792
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 2,867 gflops
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 vs 67.802
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1451.124 vs 1230.769
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 7 March 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 2,867 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 vs 67.802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 vs 1230.769 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 557 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.68 vs 70.038
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 370.179 vs 314.404
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.68 vs 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 370.179 vs 314.404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7927 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26804 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 | 67.802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1451.124 | 1230.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.038 | 81.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 314.404 | 370.179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 886 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 886 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M60 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 7 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 466 | 611 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.4 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |