NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M60 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1127 MHz
• 41.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1536
• 5.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 1,659 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7927 vs 7352
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 499
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26889 vs 21639
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 vs 92.634
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1451.124 vs 1146.534
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.266 vs 6.776
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.038 vs 18.431
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 314.404 vs 308.42

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

• Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 557 MHz
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 vs 8663
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 886
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1791
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 vs 8663
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 886
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1791

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7927 7352
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 499
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	26889 21639
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	114.389 92.634
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1451.124 1146.534
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.266 6.776
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.038 18.431
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	314.404 308.42
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8663 10572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	886 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8663 10572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	886 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791 3342

Compare specifications (specs)