NVIDIA Tesla M60 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M60 and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60

• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1051 MHz
• 23x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 93.6 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1,536
• 3.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 2,995 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7927 vs 6922
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 475
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26889 vs 22089
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 vs 95.613
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1451.124 vs 1341.18
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.266 vs 6.869

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 557 MHz
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.683 vs 70.038
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 366.321 vs 314.404
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 vs 8663
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 886
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1791
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 vs 8663
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 886
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1791

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7927 6922
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 475
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	26889 22089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	114.389 95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1451.124 1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.266 6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.038 83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	314.404 366.321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8663 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	886 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8663 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	886 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1791 3339

Compare specifications (specs)