NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 vs 6556
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 27127
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 8931
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 8931
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 1 February 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 vs 6556 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 27127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 8931 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 596
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1781
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1781
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 vs 596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1781 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 | 6556 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 782 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 27127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 263 | 327 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Shared memory | 0 |