NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 1428.6x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 37788
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1722.98
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 11.661
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 37.16
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 788.464
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 10471
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 10471
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 2 June 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 37788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 vs 1722.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 vs 11.661 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 vs 37.16 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 vs 788.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 10471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13812 vs 10909
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 855 vs 596
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 127.622
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 1976
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 1781
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 1976
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 1781
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13812 vs 10909 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 855 vs 596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 vs 127.622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 vs 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 vs 1781 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 | 13812 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 855 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 37788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 145.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1722.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 11.661 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 37.16 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 788.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 10471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 2 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 263 | 297 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $679.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 8,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 2816 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2816 | |
| Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla T4 with others
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
