NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 41% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1075 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 1428.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 37788
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 1722.98
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 11.661
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 37.16
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 788.464
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 10471
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 10471
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 2 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1075 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 37788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 10471 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13812 versus 10909
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 855 versus 596
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 127.622
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 1976
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 versus 1781
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 1976
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 versus 1781
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13812 versus 10909 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 855 versus 596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 versus 127.622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 | 13812 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 855 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 37788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5757 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU104 | GM200 |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 2 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 263 | 297 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Prix maintenant | $679.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 8,000 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2816 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,060 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2816 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 176 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.5 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |