NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 441.6 GTexel / s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4096
• Around 64% better floating-point performance: 14,131 gflops vs 8,602 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 vs 155.307
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 vs 12.49
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 vs 153.089
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 vs 857.575
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9969 vs 8673
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9969 vs 8673

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10015 vs 8260
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 843 vs 327
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3521
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3521

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8260 10015
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	327 843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	592.008 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.266 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	271.318 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2169.759 857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9969 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3521 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9969 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3521 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3361

Compare specifications (specs)