NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1380 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 64% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 441.6 GTexel / s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 4096
- Environ 64% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 14,131 gflops versus 8,602 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 67% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1752 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 versus 155.307
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 versus 12.49
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 versus 153.089
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 versus 857.575
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9969 versus 8673
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9969 versus 8673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2018 versus 24 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1380 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 441.6 GTexel / s versus 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 4096 |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,131 gflops versus 8,602 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 versus 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 versus 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 versus 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 versus 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9969 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9969 versus 8673 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10015 versus 8260
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 843 versus 327
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3521
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3521
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10015 versus 8260 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 843 versus 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3360 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8260 | 10015 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 843 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 163779 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 | 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9969 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3521 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9969 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3521 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Volta | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | GV100 | Fiji |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2018 | 24 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 155 | 218 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1380 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1230 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,131 gflops | 8,602 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 4096 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 441.6 GTexel / s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 21,100 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 191 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 897.0 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB avec des autres
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
