NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 438.4 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 2816
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 5,914 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 11675
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 11675
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2816 |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops vs 5,914 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 vs 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 vs 11675 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 59.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 62
- 59.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 62
- 58.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 57
- 58.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 57
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 57 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 62 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 62 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 57 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 57 | 3350 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9360 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.288 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GV100 | Grenada |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 271 | 268 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | 5,914 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 6,200 million |
Compute units | 44 | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |