NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- 637.3x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1752 MHz
- 60x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 62
- 60x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 57
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 57
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1752 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 44354
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 15910
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 15910
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 44354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 vs 15910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 vs 15910 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44354 | 131696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 | 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 | 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 57 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Volta |
| Code name | GP104 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 271 | 273 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 279.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 139.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.940 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 111.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) | 1752 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P5200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
