NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- 331.2x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 59.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 57
- 59.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 57
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 56602
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 12750
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 56602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 vs 12750 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 | 131696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 57 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Code name | GA106 | GV100 |
| Place in performance rating | 274 | 272 |
| Launch date | 27 March 2018 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1752 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
