NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1417 MHz
Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1531 MHz
333x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3333
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3333
Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 2243

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 2 August 2016
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1417 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1531 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319 vs 2243

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

3.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1024
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67348 vs 38863
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 9313
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 9313

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	3584 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	10008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	67348 vs 38863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10841 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10841 vs 9313

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

67348

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

10841

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3696

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

10841

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3696

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3333

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

2243

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235
PassMark - G2D Mark	430
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	67348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	2243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		165.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2368.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		17.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		21.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		992.132

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP102
Launch date	27 May 2019	2 August 2016
Place in performance rating	362	359
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,199
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1531 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1417 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	3584
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	342.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	11,800 million
Floating-point performance		10,974 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	480.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	10008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5X
Shared memory		0