NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 902 MHz
• Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
• Around 24% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2880
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 5,196 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66950 vs 24016
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 67.178
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 1816.61
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 7.435
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 355.166

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.889 vs 21.354
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 10841
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3333
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 10841
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	66950 24016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.792 67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2368.267 1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.829 7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.354 88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	992.132 355.166
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10841 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3696 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10841 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3696 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3356

Compare specifications (specs)