NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and NVIDIA Tesla M40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 948 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
- Around 60% better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63437 vs 37593
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 13.059
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 688.388
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 August 2016 vs 10 November 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 948 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63437 vs 37593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 vs 13.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 vs 688.388 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 183.81 vs 165.792
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 2368.267
- 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 21.354
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 vs 165.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 vs 2368.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 vs 21.354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M40
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | NVIDIA Tesla M40 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63437 | 37593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | 183.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | 2637.997 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | 13.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | 160.359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | 688.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9559 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10183 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP102 | GM200 |
Launch date | 2 August 2016 | 10 November 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Place in performance rating | 346 | 249 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz | 948 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |