NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 vs 12.49

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
• Around 16% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
• 1800x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 vs 383
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 158
• Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 vs 1571
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 4.046
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 140.06 vs 83.907
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.502 vs 0.371
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 vs 6.791
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 614
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1162
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 vs 1683
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 614
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1162
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 vs 1683

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 681
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	158 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1571 2473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.046 6.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	83.907 140.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.371 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.791 9.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.41 12.49
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	614 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1162 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1683 2073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	614 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1162 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1683 2073

Compare specifications (specs)