NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 versus 12.49
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 versus 12.49 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.96 GTexel / s versus 11.2 billion / sec
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 311.0 gflops versus 268.8 gflops
- 1800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 versus 383
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 versus 158
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 versus 1571
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 versus 4.046
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 140.06 versus 83.907
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.502 versus 0.371
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 versus 6.791
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 versus 614
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 versus 1162
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 versus 1683
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 versus 614
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 versus 1162
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 versus 1683
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s versus 11.2 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops versus 268.8 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 versus 383 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 versus 158 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 versus 1571 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 versus 4.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 versus 83.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 versus 0.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 versus 6.791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 versus 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 versus 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 versus 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 versus 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 versus 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 versus 1683 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 | 681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 | 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 15 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | $99.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1554 | 1440 |
Prix maintenant | $39.99 | $99.21 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.32 | 8.89 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 810 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |