AMD FirePro D500 versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro D500 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 725 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 5.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18049 versus 3413
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.776 versus 8.915
- 7.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.081 versus 146.479
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.568 versus 1.178
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.789 versus 10.689
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 3342
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 3342
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 versus 1 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18049 versus 3413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 versus 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 versus 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 versus 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 versus 10.689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3345 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 84 Watt versus 274 Watt
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt versus 274 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D500
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro D500 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18049 | 3413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 | 10.689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3345 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro D500 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | Tahiti | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 | 1 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 683 | 684 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,227 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | 392 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Longeur | 279 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 243.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro D500 avec des autres
AMDFirePro D500 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3450
AMDFirePro D500 vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
AMDFirePro D500 vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
AMDFirePro D500 vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
AMDFirePro D500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
AMDFirePro D500 vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
