AMD FirePro S7150 versus AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro S7150 and AMD Radeon R7 360 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S7150
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 117.6 GTexel / s versus 50.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 1792 versus 768
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,763 gflops versus 1,613 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 29623 versus 16225
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6147 versus 4799
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 versus 4147
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6147 versus 4799
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 versus 4147
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2016 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 117.6 GTexel / s versus 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,763 gflops versus 1,613 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29623 versus 16225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 versus 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 versus 4147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 versus 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 versus 4147 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3091 versus 2727
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 versus 465
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 versus 27.544
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 versus 570.969
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 versus 0.687
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 versus 23.637
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 583
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 583
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3091 versus 2727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 versus 465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 versus 27.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 versus 570.969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 versus 0.687 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 versus 23.637 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 583 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2727 | 3091 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 513 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29623 | 16225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | 38.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | 819.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | 3.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | 58.285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 | 4147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 583 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 | 4799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 | 4147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 583 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Tonga | Tobago |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,399 | $109 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 633 | 634 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,763 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 117.6 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 2,080 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 165 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro S7150 avec des autres
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
ATIFireGL V5600
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270DX
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
NVIDIATesla M10
AMDFirePro S7150 vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
