NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) versus AMD FirePro S7150
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD FirePro S7150 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1354 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 versus 2727
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 27.544
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 versus 570.969
- 6.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 versus 0.687
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 versus 23.637
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 versus 6147
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 583
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 versus 6147
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 583
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 1 February 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 versus 2727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 27.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 versus 570.969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 versus 0.687 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 versus 23.637 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 versus 6147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 versus 6147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 583 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S7150
- Environ 97% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 117.6 GTexel / s versus 59.72 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1792 versus 640
- Environ 97% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,763 gflops versus 1,911 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 versus 292
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 29623 versus 16873
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 versus 3721
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 versus 3721
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 117.6 GTexel / s versus 59.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,763 gflops versus 1,911 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 versus 292 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29623 versus 16873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 versus 3721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 versus 3721 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 2727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16873 | 29623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 27.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 570.969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 0.687 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 23.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | 6147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 4359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | 6147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 4359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 583 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD FirePro S7150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | Tonga |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 1 February 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 643 | 644 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops | 3,763 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s | 117.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 5,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 210S
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270DX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro S7150
