AMD FirePro V5900 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro V5900 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro V5900
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 19.2 GTexel / s versus 17.28 GTexel / s
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 144
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 614.4 gflops versus 414.7 gflops
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1238 versus 1101
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 351 versus 325
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 409.102 versus 306.536
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.064 versus 18.564
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.259 versus 35.369
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 versus 3356
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s versus 17.28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 144 |
| Performance á point flottant | 614.4 gflops versus 414.7 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1238 versus 1101 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 versus 325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 409.102 versus 306.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.064 versus 18.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.259 versus 35.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 720 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3677 versus 2880
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.32 versus 8.167
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.883 versus 0.772
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1893 versus 1713
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3323 versus 2091
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1893 versus 1713
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3323 versus 2091
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 720 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3677 versus 2880 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.32 versus 8.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.883 versus 0.772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 versus 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3323 versus 2091 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 versus 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3323 versus 2091 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V5900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro V5900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1238 | 1101 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 | 325 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2880 | 3677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.167 | 10.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 409.102 | 306.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.772 | 0.883 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.064 | 18.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.259 | 35.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1713 | 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2091 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1713 | 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2091 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro V5900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Cayman | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 24 May 2011 | 14 May 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1091 | 1092 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $55.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.90 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 614.4 gflops | 414.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 144 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s | 17.28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,640 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 230 mm | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
