AMD FirePro W5130M versus AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W5130M and AMD Radeon HD 7750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5130M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 925 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.6 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 947.2 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 3.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.588 versus 21.658
- 6.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1879 versus 305
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2090 versus 1439
- 6.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1879 versus 305
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2090 versus 1439
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 October 2015 versus 15 February 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 versus 21.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 versus 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 versus 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 versus 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 versus 1439 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1698 versus 1410
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 versus 301
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 versus 505.57
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 versus 1.885
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 versus 30.114
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 versus 89.784
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 versus 2582
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 versus 2582
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1698 versus 1410 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 versus 301 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 versus 505.57 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 versus 1.885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 versus 30.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 versus 89.784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 versus 2582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 versus 2582 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro W5130M | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 | 1698 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 426 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5198 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 | 21.658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 505.57 | 566.052 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 | 2.182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.114 | 37.143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 | 98.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 | 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 | 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2582 | 3295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 | 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 | 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2582 | 3295 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro W5130M | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Tropo | Cape Verde |
Date de sortie | 2 October 2015 | 15 February 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1139 | 1142 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | 800 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,500 million |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |